276°
Posted 20 hours ago

Vanishing Acts: When is it right to steal a child from her mother? Jodi Picoult's explosive and emotive Sunday Times bestseller.

£4.495£8.99Clearance
ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
ZTS2023
Joined in 2023
82
63

About this deal

I’m sitting on the living room floor after dinner, swatches of fabric covering my legs like a patchwork quilt. “Who cares whether the napkins are blue or teal?” I complain. “Isn’t teal really just blue on steroids, anyway?” Elise tells Delia, “If you had grown up with me, this is one of the things I would have tried to teach you: marry a man who loves you more than you love him. Because I have done both now, and when it is the other way around, there is no spell in the world that can even out the balance.” Discuss this in terms of Delia’s relationships with both Eric and Fitz. Which man do you think Delia should be with, and why? But Delia doesn't care about Eric, Delia cares about Delia, and it never crosses her mind to hire someone else. This is because Delia lives in a novel and Jodi Picoult has a lot of points to make. When she learns she was kidnapped as a child, Delia’s choice of profession takes on a new significance. What motivated Delia to pursue a career in search-and-rescue? Does she view it differently once she knows about her past? A recurrent theme in Vanishing Acts is self-identity. Are we products of our pasts, or do we have more control over whom we become?

Durch die Vielzahl der Themen, die jedes für sich allein genommen reichlich Stoff für ein Buch hergeben, kann natürlich jedes einzelne Thema nur höchst oberflächlich behandelt werden. Right versus wrong is a dominant theme in Vanishing Acts— whether Andrew was right or wrong to kidnap Delia, whether Eric is right or wrong to hide his continued drinking from Delia, whether Delia is right or wrong not to stop Ruthann. How do the multiple perspectives in the story blur these lines and show how two people can view the same situation completely different? Were there any instances you changed your mind about something in the story after reading a different character’s viewpoint? Not over my eyes. You know, it was different [from the conned investors]. It was love. So, you know, love is more powerful than money. And you learn that when you go through my situation. You can't replace a human being but you can certainly replace money. I’m a living example of that." What about the senior officer who said that you had “likely killed” Melissa? How do you feel about him now?

Reader Reviews

We were born on the same day on April 21st but I’m 41 now. So I just sort of do things that we would do together and that makes me feel happy. They’re little things that we liked to do like sitting and looking at the ocean or going for walks, I do all that kind of thing." Just then the Carroll police officer bursts into the clearing. “I’ll be damned,” he wheezes. “You actually found her.” Melissa’s childhood friend unwittingly gets caught up in Melissa’s scam when she invests her entire life savings with her trusted best pal, but ends up losing everything. Maya has had roles in Wolf Creek, Love Child and The Messenger. People felt the characters were unbelievable, well they must not know a lot of people,because it takes all kinds in this world and yes they were beliavable! That as time goes on, all that remains is truth and lies and speculation and guesses and estimations. I feel like the documentary sort of points to that. People can judge but at the end of the day, you really need to look someone in the eyes to understand who they are or what they're about. I couldn’t judge anyone without doing that."

I’ve lived in New Hampshire my whole life. No citrus tree can bear our climate, where we have not only White Christmases but also White Halloweens. I reach into the tree and pull down the yellow ball: a crumbling sphere made of birdseed and suet. We're never given enough information for this to have seemed to have been an informed decision. The woman obviously wasn't in any advanced state of cancer, as she hiked out to this remote spot to jump from, and had previously continued every activity of daily living unimpaired. Why Picoult would even want to put this in a book calls her entire brain into question. I've read 3 books by Jodi Picoult now, and liked each one progressively less than the one I read before it. I'll give her one or two more tries, but unless I like them a whole lot better than this one, I'll give her up entirely. Due to the multitude of topics, each of which alone provides plenty of material for a book, each individual topic can of course only be treated very superficially.This book is about a young woman in her late twenties who grew up with her devoted, single father. She has been very close friends with her two peers, Eric and Fitz, since she was a child. She has a four-year-old daughter with Eric and is engaged to him. Andrew himself says, “Does it really matter why I did it? By now, you’ve already formed your impression. You believe that an act committed a lifetime ago defines a man, or you believe that a person’s past has nothing to do with his future.” A person cannot change his or her past actions, but can they make up for the hurt they’ve caused by helping others? Does the good that Andrew has done for the town of Wexton and for the senior citizens in his care— not to mention the happy childhood he gave Delia— make up for or excuse his taking his daughter? What do you make of Elise’s remark to Andrew that Delia “turned out absolutely perfect”? Before I know it, I am telling Fitz about the lemon tree. I explain how it felt as if the heat was laying a crown on my head; how the tree had been planted with pebbles around it instead of soil.. How I could read the letters ABC, on the bottoms of my shoes. Andrew says, “Believe what you want, but be prepared to answer this question: In my shoes, how do you know you wouldn't have done the same thing?” Would you have done the same thing? If you feel that what Andrew did was wrong, what would have been a more appropriate alternative to ensure Delia's best interests? I don't have this intensive or intimate relationship with my father but I really appreciated Jodi's novel. Thumbs up Jodi and judging from what you wrote you really had a golden heart that can be shared and appreciated by others. Don't forget my orchard trip!

Severe emotional dependency (which the author seems to view less as problematic than rather as desirable) No, because she had investors that were working for her every day, so I had no reason to question it. I was the most in-the-dark person out of everyone. I’m a very straight and narrow person. I just make people feel good about themselves by fixing their hair up. I'm a pretty simple creature. So I didn't, especially at that point, understand the financial industry whatsoever." Everything inside me goes to stone. If I open up that door, I will only hear something that I am not willing to hear – that Eric has been arrested for drunk driving; that he’s been in an accident. Or something worse. Delia believes “it takes two people to make a lie work: the person who tells it, and the one who believes it.” How do the characters in the novel, including Delia herself, prove this to be true? Recommended, but feel free to skim the prison section. It doesn’t add anything to the plot or to the issues under consideration.

Book Summary

Eric believes that he does not have “the experience or the wits or the confidence” to represent Andrew. Why then does he agree to take on the case? Why does he continue to act as Andrew’s attorney even when it causes tension between him and Delia? I know,” I reply, but I watch Holly Gardiner and her mother walk to their car hand in hand, like two jewels on a delicate strand that might at any moment be broken.

Indeed some of the characters are interesting but too many of their actions felt contrived. As so many of this authors books focus on similar topics, she needs to ensure that every single one is brilliant. This was just about okay. To date, her best book has been The Storyteller. The officer is someone I’ve worked with; Greta and I helped him find a robbery suspect who ran from the scene of a crime. “Delia,” he says evenly. Many of the chapters told from Andrew’s point of view occur while he is in prison, “where everyone reinvents himself.” What do these scenes, which depict in graphic detail the harsh realities of life behind bars, reveal about Andrew? What do they add to the overall storyline? In one instance Delia says to Fitz about meeting her mother for the first time, “I want this to be perfect. I want her to be perfect. But what if she’s not? What if I’m not?” How does the reality measure up when she finally meets her mother? What kind of understanding do Delia and Elise come to? Why does Elise give Delia the “spell”— is it to help Andrew or her daughter? At the heart of this missing persons case is a handful of victims and many, many missing millions. Potentially finding out what happened to Melissa and drawing attention to her case globally, it could bring an important chance for closure for so many of the people involved.”Delia ist keine Figur, die mir sonderlich sympathisch war. Sie ist umgeben von 3 Männern, die alles für sie tun, benimmt sich aber so, als ob das alles für sie nicht genug ist. Immediately, relief swims through me. If they want my father, this isn’t about Eric. “I’ll get him,” I offer, but when I turn around he’s already standing there.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment