A History of Central Banking in Great Britain and the United States (Studies in Macroeconomic History)

Product Information

Ugolini concludes as follows: “central banking is deeply rooted in the economic and political context in which it happens to operate, and that the evolution of the former closely depends on the evolution of the latter” (p. 271). Readers of “institutionalist” style books of central banking would have reached the same conclusions. Hopefully, this is welcome as it means that the functional and institutional approaches yield similar results but this also means that no fundamentally new insights about the evolution of central banking are generated. Around 600BC Latium came under the control of the Etruscans. This lasted until the last king, Tarquin the Proud, was expelled in 509BC and the Roman Republic was established. The Etruscans, a people of Aryan origin, created one of the most advanced civilisations of that period and built roads, temples and numerous public buildings in Rome. Also included were these words: “Goodson was a remarkable economist, reformer, researcher and author. Stephen provided a tremendous service for future freedom and prosperity by lifting the veil of secrecy of so many facts and facets of the history of central banking and the enslavement of mankind.” The truth is money is fake, people will trade with whatever medium of exchange the perceived authority wants them to, and as long as this authority borrows money only from itself debt can be cleared without issue, and the nation can remain independent, answerable only to itself, and with a population entitled to a share of what the whole can provide.

Alan Greenspan, chairman of America’s Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, is one of the most controversial central bankers of all. His tenure included one of the longest periods of low inflation and solid growth in American history—later called the “Great Moderation”. But he also presided over the buildup of risks that led to the financial crisis of 2007-09. Sebastian Mallaby (a former Economist correspondent and husband of our editor-in-chief) provides a deeply critical but ultimately sympathetic portrayal of this polarising figure. The Hidden Origins of the Bank of England ...all great events have been distorted, most of the important causes concealed…If the history of England is ever written by one who has the knowledge and the courage, the world would be astonished. - Benjamin Disraeli, Prime Minister of Great Britain Pierre Siklos is Professor of Economics at Wilfrid Laurier University and the Balsillie School of International Affairs. His latest books on central banking are Central Banks into the Breach: From Triumph to Crisis and the Road Ahead and The Economics of Central Banking, co-edited with David Mayes and Jan-Egbert Sturm, both published by Oxford University Press I do not have the expertise to say whether Goodson’s findings are accurate, but I do know that the raw nerves he touches are on account of central banking and the monetary system created thereunder being at the core of the persistent profound and inhumane differences in wealth distribution within any given country, and among countries. For this reason, for several years, my Party and I have argued that South Africa should reform its central banking and monetary system, even if that means placing our country out of step with iniquitous world standards.Money Creation in the Modern Economy. By Michael McLeay, Amar Radia and Ryland Thomas of the Bank’s Monetary Analysis Directorate. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin. Q1, 2014. Stephen Mitford Goodson recently passed away and something about his eulogy inspired me to find this book. Rudyard Kipling’s poem If was included in the eulogy at his funeral and it immediately triggered my curiosity. Ugolini has written a compact history of the critical functions of central banks emphasizing how the forces of centralization spurred or prevented financial innovations. The approach taken is a fresh one and will be useful, especially to scholars who are interested in specific areas where central banks have played an important role in economic development over time. That said, does the book provide new insights into central banks and their functions? This is debatable. For example, while financial stability is often mentioned it is not treated as a separate function. This is a shame in light of the ongoing debate about whether central banks are possibly over-burdened with responsibilities. It is also relevant for the question of the degree of centralization of the various functions considered at the level of a single institution. Stated differently, greater emphasis by the author on governance matters might have helped. So yes, it is an informative, yet contentious book to read, but well worth the time. I do not agree with everything in the book and for this reason am indulging in the rebel-rouser, Yanis Varoufakis's, books as well. However, I expected some big differences, but I only encountered remarkable agreements between two authors who never met. But I'm still digging.

Central banks learned to be lenders of last resort and provide financial stability but the pursuit of “too big to fail” led to the development of fiscally resolved banking crises. The Global Financial Crisis was a major departure from the post–Great Depression experience for many advanced countries, but the lessons learned then prevented another financial crisis in 2020. However, the expansion of banks’ toolkits to include credit policy, a form of fiscal policy, threatens central-bank independence. The book, published in 2016, goes to lengths to understand Mr Greenspan’s psychology, not only his adventures in the halls of power. He was once a jazz musician, loves tennis and counts Ayn Rand as a major intellectual influence—Mr Greenspan introduced her to President Gerald Ford. It assesses what Mr Greenspan’s career might tell us about the Fed’s response to the mortgage bubble of the 2000s. Contrary to common perception, he was not married to simple economic models and had no fantasies about “efficient markets” or “rational behaviour”. Instead he had a keen eye for economic data and stressed the importance of finance to the economy before it became vogue after the crisis. His mistake, then, was in miscalculating how risks in the mortgage market could be systemically harmful. The book offers an explanation for this: over his career he had been able to prevent many bubbles from causing widespread harm, such as in the panic of 1987, so he paid less attention to the buildup of risks in the 2000s. However, he was less than decisive in quelling the risks he was aware of. As Mr Mallaby puts it: “Greenspan was the man who knew. He was not the man who acted.” Read a longer review by Martin Wolf published in The Economist.

A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960” by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz. This classic, published in 1963, provided the intellectual foundations for monetarism, a popular school of economic thought. The foundations of the Great Moderation were undercut at the beginning of the twenty-first century by fears of a Japan-style deflation and of being trapped in the zero lower bound. This set the stage for the Global Financial Crisis. The crisis was triggered by the collapse of a major credit-driven housing boom in the US and Europe, fostered by financial innovation, lax financial regulation, and loose monetary policy. It was allayed by enhanced lender-of-last-resort and credit policies and aggressive monetary and fiscal policies. A consequence of the crisis is that some central banks extended their financial stability mandate from lender of last resort to the prevention of credit-driven asset price booms (“leaning against the wind” policy)—which has not been proven to be successful ( Svensson, 2017) and to the use of preventative macro prudential policy. The Fed and others continued to worry about the zero lower bound and followed quantitative easing and forward-guidance policies with limited success in reaching their 2 percent inflation targets.

Yanis Varoufakis, the proud radical leftist Greek economist and former minister of finance in Greece, calls ‘them’ the bankruptocracy in his book, Adults In The Room: my battle with Europe’s deep establishment. He has written several other books on the topic as well, including The Global Minotaur: America, Europe and the Future of the Global Economy and Modern Political Economics: Making Sense of the Post-2008 World. He is a popular and internationally well-known writer, author, and professor of economics. This book is bound to be controversial and engender strong reactions. Why would a seemingly arid subject matter such as the history of central banking and of the monetary system give rise to such strong reactions?Money, being naturally barren, to make it breed money is preposterous and a perversion from the end of its institution, which was only to serve the purpose of exchange and not of increase...Men called bankers we shall hate, for they enrich themselves while doing nothing. The 'scam' of the money-lenders is the ability to literally create money from nothing, and then lend and accumulate interest on "credit," and then re-lend that interest for further interest, in perpetuity, that creates pervasive, worldwide debt, from the individual, to the family, to the entire state.