Time and the Conways and Other Plays (I Have Been Here Before, An Inspector Calls, The Linden Tree)

Product Information

The play emerged from Priestley’s reading of J. W. Dunne’s book An Experiment with Timein which Dunne posits that all time is happening simultaneously; i.e., that past, present, future are one and that linear time is only the way in which human consciousness is able to perceive this. [3] Priestley was somewhat obsessed by time, and tended to believe in a cyclic time, in the way of Hinduism. His plays where this can be best noticed are Dangerous Corner and I Have Been Here Before, both of which I didn't like. But in "Time & the Conways" this is scarcely noticed, while the story of the family destroyed by time, which we can see through Kay's eyes in the second act, is quite moving. Only Alan's words, speaking of the circle whose center is God, point at a cyclical view of time. The Conway children enter the stage at different times. What we witness is the destruction of relationships over time, as well as the destruction of the family estate to due Mrs. Conway’s inept management of funds. Each character is harsher with no golden glow of happiness on their faces. Kay faces her life alone in a job that does not interest her, Robin is a drunk and an absent father, Hazel becomes an insecure and timid wife. Madge becomes a strict and joyless headmistress, and Mrs.Conway is a pathetic and spiteful shadow of herself. The only ones unchanged are Carol, and Alan. His inability to be angry, or what his family may refer to as his inability to think deeply about anything, is arguably a reiteration of his understanding of Blake’s poem. Alan does not feel the constraints of time like other characters. He understands that the heartwarming memories of his family in 1919 are equally as important to his makeup and his life as the grim times. At the other end of the scale is her future brother-in-law Gerald, a heartless Northern capitalist and another character borrowed from Chekhov, whose awfulness is a tribute to actor Adrian Scarborough. The Conway children, who number six, individually divulge their hopes and plans for the future, so far as they've made any at all. These mostly comprise expectations of marital bliss with the right partner but one daughter plans to be a novelist, another a social campaigner while the youngest and least affected of their number, the bright 18-year-old Carol dreams of the stage but most of all just living her life to the full.

Domestic Abuse: The details stay offstage, but in 1937 Hazel is clearly terrified of her abusive husband Ernest. The play works on the level of a universal human tragedy and a powerful portrait of the history of Britain between the Wars. Priestley shows how through a process of complacency and class arrogance, Britain allowed itself to decline and collapse between 1919 and 1937, instead of realizing the availability of immense creative and humanistic potential accessible during the post-war (theGreat War) generation. Priestley could clearly see the tide of history leading towards another major European conflict as he has his character Ernest comment in 1937 that they are coming to ‘the next war’. This makes the play strangely Chekhovian and Francesca Annis' optimistic but hopeless mother is straight out of the great Russian's stable. The actress is convincing in the part and does the most effective impression of Joan Plowright imaginable in portraying the older Mrs Conway.other properties. The family begins to argue, and Madge accuses her mother of wasting money on her favorite son, Robin. We learn of other guests who do not appear in the play, and of Robin, the younger son: he has been in the RAF, but is due to be "demobbed" (return to civilian life). Robin is his mother's favourite and she is disappointed by his absence (so far) from the party. Alan reappears with Joan Helford. Joan is a rather foolish but pleasant young woman, who is Hazel's friend. Alan is attentive to Joan, but she evidently finds him dull company. The overlap with Strange Interlude is in the conflict between peepholes and landscapes. Conways covers roughly the same period of time (even the same years) as Strange Interlude, and both distort the audience’s ability to experience this time. Where Strange Interlude portrays half-hour clippings throughout the lives of the characters, Time and the Conways portrays two moments at either end of the continuum. However, the way Priestley presents these two moments actually removes the audience from the experience of the characters, where O’Neill fixated on pressing the audience as close to the experience and thoughts of the characters as possible. The audience has a pretty firm grasp on the events of these twenty years after Act II of Priestley’s play, so going into Act III, seeing the foolishness and naiveté of the characters is frustrating and painful. The audience is squirming, while almost every character is celebrating in blissful ignorance. The only character that shares the experience of the audience is Kay, when she glimpses the future. Time and the Conways is the second of J.B. Priestley’s Time Plays—six plays (the first being Dangerous Corner) dealing with different theories of time, and how time is experienced. This play focuses on the Conways, a wealthy family living in a prosperous suburb of the fictitious manufacturing town Newlingham, and their declining fortunes between 1919 and 1937. The first act takes place during Kay Conway’s twenty-first birthday in 1919. Aside from Mrs. Conway, the Conways are all in their early twenties or younger, and have their whole lives ahead of them. The boys of the family have just returned from war. Mrs. Conway, the widowed mother of all of them, owns lots of valuable real estate in Newlingham. The future appears bright. Act 2 opens on the same room, with Kay still seated by the window. When Alan Conway enters and turns on the lights, it is apparent that the act is set in a different time: The room is redecorated, and there is a wireless set onstage. Kay and Alan are middle-aged. They greet each other and discuss Kay’s job as a tabloid film journalist in London. Kay reveals that she has given up writing novels and that she has had an unhappy affair with a married man. Alan, somewhat seedy and still a clerk, presents Kay with a gift: It is again her birthday, this time her fortieth.

Comment on the importance of the ideas of homes in the two works. This could be further extended by commenting on the importance, in each work, of the towns where the stories are set: grim industrial Coketown and middle-class suburban Newlingham.If he did, he gave himself a bit of an out, in Alan. Although it’s easy to come out the end of the third act, the end of the play, with a feeling of hopelessness from all the ironic optimism, there is a moment of genuine optimism embedded in the end of the second act. Of all the Conways, Alan is the only one who doesn’t seem miserable. He’s as subdued and reserved in 1937 as he is in 1919. Priestley wasn’t bold enough to have Alan proclaim that the next war really would set things straight, but he at least nodded to his own inability to see what was coming: Carol Conway, the youngest child. Sixteen years old as the play begins, she is energetic and charming, without the social affectations seen in most of the family. She is also very morbid and is obsessed with thoughts of death, particularly with memories of her father’s drowning. She is the only member of the family who welcomes Ernest Beevers into their social circle. Carol dies young, and her death symbolizes the loss of vitality and goodness in the Conways. Alan's retreat into the dull life of a shabby town hall clerk follows his disappointment in love: he is in love with Joan, and his stability and patience might enable her to achieve domestic happiness. Alan follows Joan as the game of "Hide and Seek" begins, but she begs him to leave, as she is attracted to the dashing but worthless Robin; she is infatuated with him but cannot see that they are ill-matched - she is too weak to sort him out, and he will not accept his responsibility as a husband or father: Mrs. Conway is pleased by the courtship as she is incapable of seeing her younger son's failings.

Time and the Conways (1937), which explores J. W. Dunne's theory of simultaneous time expounded in the book An Experiment with Time;Big, Screwed-Up Family: The Conways of 1937 qualify. They’ve drifted apart, they’re generally unhappy, and there are some bitter divisions. It's a clever play - Priestly wrote some excellent books and drama. There's a touch of melodrama in it, and maybe some fatalism - but the content will stay with you. The acting (as are most British plays of this vintage) is superb. Claire Bloom (as the mother) is wonderfully touching, then catty, then dominant, the manipulative. The final act continues where the first leaves off, but it is shadowed, made far bleaker by what has come immediately before. In Act Two, Priestley leaps ahead to the family as they will be in 1937, the year the play was written. The idealistic Madge - perfectly pitched by Fenella Woolgar, who is first seen expatiating her socialist principles, hands on hips in a velvet evening gown - has put on tweeds and become a bossy schoolmistress. The novelist has wizened into a journalist. The beauty is bullied. One of the sibs is dead. These look not like avoidable futures (which is the case in An Inspector Calls) but like destinies. Priestley seems to have been so cross with his characters for their strangled vowels and limited social outlooks that he's doomed them.

There's little sign of conservatism in Second Coming/Winter, Again, the new double bill from Dundee Rep's resident sister company, Scottish Dance Theatre. It is difficult to imagine a more distinct contrast between two modern dance pieces than exists here between the works of Los Angeles choreographer Victor Quijada and his Norwegian counterpart Jo Strømgren. Thus, although we have seen the frustration of the hopes of most of the characters, we realize that Alan has come to a philosophical acceptance of life's hardships, while Kay has a real prospect of a new start. On the surface Time and the Conways appears to tell the story of a group of young people whose hopes of happiness are frustrated - by their own mistakes or by the interference of others. At a deeper level, the play explores the idea whether happiness is possible, and whether we can change the course of our lives.The play was revived on Broadway in a Roundabout Theatreproduction at the American Airlines Theatre. The play ran from 10 October 2017 to 26 November 2017. Directed by Rebecca Taichman, the cast featured Elizabeth McGovern(Mrs. Conway), Steven Boyer (Ernest), Gabriel Ebert (Alan), Anna Baryshnikov (Carol), Anna Camp(Hazel), Charlotte Parry(Kay Conway) and Matthew James Thomas (Robin). [7] [8] Time and the Conways is one of the Time Plays in which the writer explores the outer reaches of physics and the ideas of J.W.Dunne. In the most simplified form, he believed that, rather than being linear, time, like geography, happens all at once but in different spaces. The play works on the level of a universal human tragedy and a powerful portrait of the history of Britain between the Wars. Priestley shows how through a process of complacency and class arrogance, Britain allowed itself to decline and collapse between 1919 and 1937, instead of realizing the availability of immense creative and humanistic potential accessible during the post-war (the Great War) generation. Priestley could clearly see the tide of history leading towards another major European conflict as he has his character Ernest comment in 1937 that they are coming to 'the next war'. Hazel is said to be the same age as Joan. Numbers in bold are Priestley's indications of age in the dialogue or stage-directions.