Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Michelangelo Signorile urges same-sex couples to “demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society’s moral codes but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution.” [43] Same-sex couples should “fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, because the most subversive action lesbians and gay men can undertake…is to transform the notion of ‘family’ entirely.” [44] The norm of permanency ensures that children will at least be cared for by their mother and father until they reach maturity. It also provides kinship structure for interaction across generations as elderly parents are cared for by their adult children and as grandparents help to care for their grandchildren without the complications of fragmented stepfamilies. Cardiovascular health seems to be directly linked to stress levels, and women who are unhappily married seem to be especially affected.
Marriage: What It Is, Why It Matters, and the Consequences of Marriage: What It Is, Why It Matters, and the Consequences of
Forrest, W. (2014). Cohabitation, relationship quality, and desistance from crime. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 539–556. By recognizing marriage, the government supports economic well-being. The benefits of marriage led Professor W. Bradford Wilcox to summarize a study he led as part of the University of Virginia’s National Marriage Project in this way: “The core message…is that the wealth of nations depends in no small part on the health of the family.” [19] The same study suggests that marriage and fertility trends “play an underappreciated and important role in fostering long-term economic growth, the viability of the welfare state, the size and quality of the workforce, and the health of large sectors of the modern economy.” [20] Government can treat people equally—and leave them free to live and love as they choose—without redefining marriage. A piece in The Advocate candidly admits where the logic of redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships leads: Anti-equality right-wingers have long insisted that allowing gays to marry will destroy the sanctity of “traditional marriage,” and, of course, the logical, liberal party-line response has long been “No, it won’t.” But what if—for once—the sanctimonious crazies are right? Could the gay male tradition of open relationships actually alter marriage as we know it? And would that be such a bad thing? [39] We often protest when homophobes insist that same sex marriage will change marriage for straight people too. But in some ways, they’re right. [40] In recent decades, marriage has been weakened by a revisionist view of marriage that is more about adults’ desires than children’s needs. This view reduces marriage primarily to emotional bonds or legal privileges. Redefining marriage represents the culmination of this revisionism and would leave emotional intensity as the only thing that sets marriage apart from other bonds.Just as the complementarity of a man and a woman is important for the type of union they can form, so too is it important for how they raise children. There is no such thing as “parenting.” There is mothering, and there is fathering, and children do best with both. While men and women are each capable of providing their children with a good upbringing, there are, on average, differences in the ways that mothers and fathers interact with their children and the functional roles that they play. This article will discuss some of the positive effects of marriage and some of the negative physical effects of a strained and stressful marriage. Beijers, J., Bijleveld, C., & van Poppel, F. (2012). Man’s best possession: period effects in the association between marriage and offending. European Journal of Criminology, 9(4), 425–441.
Marital Status and Self-Rated Health in China: A Longitudinal Marital Status and Self-Rated Health in China: A Longitudinal
Wilson, D. B. (2010). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and STATA. Retrieved from http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html.a b c d "The Effects of Marriage on Health: A Synthesis of Recent Research Evidence. Research Brief". ASPE. 2016-04-11 . Retrieved 2018-05-04. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31(3), 301–325.
The Marriage Effect (Audio Download): Karla Sorensen, Stephen
However, if marriage were just intense emotional regard, marital norms would make no sense as a principled matter. There is no reason of principle that requires an emotional union to be permanent. Or limited to two persons. Or sexual, much less sexually exclusive (as opposed to “open”). Or inherently oriented to family life and shaped by its demands. Couples might live out these norms where temperament or taste motivated them, but there would be no reason of principle for them to do so and no basis for the law to encourage them to do so. As with other public policy issues, religious voices on marriage should be welcomed in the public square. Yet one need not appeal to distinctively religious arguments to understand why marriage—as a natural institution—is the union of man and woman. Barnes, J. C., & Beaver, K. M. (2012). Marriage and desistance from crime: a consideration of gene–environment correlation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(1), 19–33. Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: do gender and socio-historical context matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 3–24.
Finally, support for marriage between a man and a woman is no excuse for animus against those with same-sex attractions or for ignoring the needs of individuals who, for whatever reason, may never marry. They are no less worthy than others of concern and respect. Yet this same diligent concern for the common good requires protecting and strengthening the marriage culture by promoting the truth about marriage. The Consequences of Redefining Marriage Social Trends Institute, “The Sustainable Demographic Dividend: What Do Marriage and Fertility Have to Do with the Economy?” 2011, http://sustaindemographicdividend.org/articles/the-sustainable-demographic (accessed March 4, 2013).
Marriage Effect by Karla Sorensen Ebook Epub PDF lxf - MyGet _The Marriage Effect by Karla Sorensen Ebook Epub PDF lxf - MyGet
Stress in a marriage can also be the cause of increased blood sugar levels and the increased risk of developing type two diabetes. A loving couple who seeks to bring out the best in one another can look forward to a long and fruitful life, enjoying their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren together. 4. Married people age more happily Isabel V. Sawhill, “Families at Risk,” in Henry J. Aaron and Robert D. Reischauer, eds., Setting National Priorities: The 2000 Election and Beyond (Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1999), pp. 97 and 108. See also Witherspoon Institute, “Marriage and the Public Good,” p. 15.
Robert Rector, “Marriage: America’s Greatest Weapon Against Child Poverty,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No. 117, September 5, 2012, http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/09/marriage-americas-greatest-weapon-against-child-poverty. If a couple gets married when they are both still young, the effects of early marriage on health can be either positive or negative, depending on their maturity and commitment to each other.
Great Deal 
New Comment